Thursday, September 22, 2016

Blog Post

Summation:

     According to Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist, most people will lie/cheat if it only has a small gain. Too much of a gain will prick our conscience and remind us not to lie. His article "Why We Lie" is about how the average person will always take the lie/cheat, as long as it's not too big of a gain (1).
     Dan Ariely performed a series of tests on unsuspecting people. They were each given a series of math problems and told to solve them. There was a control group that solved about 4 problems every 5 minutes (Ariely, par. 7). With another group, after they finished the problems, they would place the math problems in a shredder, with no evidence, they would then tell someone how many problems they solved in order to collect their reward, this group claimed to solve 6 problems (Ariely, par. 7).
     This goes on to support his reasoning that if there's a small benefit involved, then it doesn't grate on our conscience as much, and so we can talk ourselves into lying/cheating. However, once the stakes are higher, it seems like too much to most people and we can't do it. For example, when the people in another group were offered 10 dollars per problem, most of them were truthful about how many were solved because it was too big of a cheat, they couldn't do it and still feel like a good person (Ariely, par. 8). 
     There may be those precious few who say they solved an unrealistic amount to get the reward and the few that won't even think of lying. but most people will take that small cheat because it's just one time, or just a few dollars (Ariely, par. 4).

I replied to Andrea F's blog.
I replied to Makayla's blog.

Paraphrasing paragraph 10:

     Realizing that now and then almost everybody cheats, it's now time to figure out what makes people do it, whether for more or less.

Quotation:

     Behavioral Economist Dan Ariely states "But locking our doors against the dishonest monsters will not keep them out; they will always cheat their way in. It is the woman down the hallway-the sweet one who could not even carry away your flat-screen tv if she wanted to-who needs to be reminded constantly that, even if the door is open, she cannot just walk in and "borrow" a cup of sugar without asking." (Ariely, par. 26).
     I chose this quote because it was a really good way to end off the essay, I feel like it does a good job of summarizing what Dan Ariely is trying to point out in his essay, and it leaves you with an example that you can relate to. It's also a good example of deciding what your audience is like and would relate to. In this case, you can guess that he assumed most people have a pesky neighbor to deal with.


Citations:


(1). Ariely, Dan. "Why We Lie." The Bedford Reader 12th (2014): 440-46. Print.

6 comments:

  1. Kaylin
    I really enjoyed reading your blog. I agree that the ending quote you chose was a great way to wrap up the whole just of the article. Your summary was very thorough and nicely worded and you did a good job with including all the important aspects when paraphrasing paragraph 10...nice work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much! Paragraph 10 made me nervous because I didn't realize how short it was when I first started paraphrasing, nut I guess I figured it out:)

      Delete
  2. Kaylin,
    I absoloutly love the quote you chose. It is deffenetly a true point that gives the article the 'home run' effect. I think most of us can relate to the image of the 'person next door.' Also, I like your pesky neighbor sentence at the end. It sure gave me a good chuckle.
    On the flip side, I really think you did a great job on your summary. You had most of the aspects of the article without it being to lengthy. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Makayla! I thought that was my one mistake after I read other people's blogs, that it was too lengthy, but that helps to reassure me!I totally forgot that I posted the bit about the neighbor, it was a half-formed idea at the time! But I'm glad it caused some laughter!

      Delete
  3. Hi Kaylin, you did a great job following the assignment guidelines! I noticed that you said that the control group didn't get payed, but if I remember correctly, they did. If they didn't get payed it would confound the experiment by adding too many variables. It was the chance to not get caught cheating (via shredder) that caused the cheating. I like how short and to the point this article was. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right, I was trying to summarize it without quoting the whole essay so I didn't look in the book once I read it a few times, that was a mistake I guess. Thank you for the pointer!

      Delete